5 Comments

> Someone seated next to Professor Morris

lol

Expand full comment

Like many defenders of Israel, Destiny assumed that nobody would follow up on any of the assertions he made. Finklestein has encountered this tactic before. Alan Dershowitz challenged him to name “one factual mistake” in his book, assuming that this would make him look strong and decisive on camera. Finklestein repeated a figure that his book underreported by a figure of ten times, citing the page number back to a speechless Dershowitz.

This is how Finklestein operates. He made a name for himself in Israel/Palestine studies by debunking Joan Peters’ apologia From Time Immemorial. How did he fundamentally disprove the central thesis of that book? By checking the footnotes.

Expand full comment

Underreported by a factor of 100. 2-3,000 vs. 2-300,000.

https://youtu.be/S4rP8f7VExA?si=y8GsKuFX5gFE7jI_

Expand full comment

I re-listened to all 5 hours of the debate, and read the transcript ( probbly something Professor Finkeistein would do. Here are my five conclusions;

1. Humanity has more commonality than difference.

2. People have to live somewhere.

3. Extermination is not legal.

4. Retribution never evens the score.

5. Grandmothers deserve to know and love their offspring.

What are yours?

Expand full comment

10k books vs. 2 wikipedi (plural?) Maybe that's a generational comment as well.

Expand full comment